How far back does the immigration check records in order for the person to renew their green card?


like how do u know for sure that they check 3 yrs or more n how does it effect? would there be a chance if someone had a bad record n they went to renew it?

They don’t go back any specific time frame. You are queried in the system and if any negative things come up you will have to answer for them. If they are serious issues you will be sent before an immigration judge to have your green card revoked and you will be deported. Until you are a citizen you can always be deported even if you have been living here 30 years and have USC kids. Don’t commit crimes or stay out of the United States for more than 6 months at a time and you should not have any issues.

Decision 2006 - Is The Republican ‘cut, Run And Scare’ Strategy Running On Fumes?


Over the course of George Bush’s six years in office it has become abundantly clear that Mr. Bush and his cronies are in a state of “willful denial” about the worsening situation in Iraq….and so is a large chunk of the American public, willingly or due to misleading partisan information.

As the temperature rises and with less than 5 weeks left to the mid-term elections, some of the most zealous backers of this administration in the Republican Party are running scared leaving Mr. Bush trapped holding the “hot plate.”

With the on-going “Sex & Pedophilia” scandal involving now resigned Republican Congressman, Mark Foley (R – FL), the focus on this administration has switched gears mid-stream—from a wanton catastrophe to a circus of “Catastrophilia.”

A homosexual Republican Congressman with Pedophilic tendencies is like “manna from heaven” for the Democrats. They can’t ask for a better gift so close to the elections—an opportunity to expose Republican hypocrisy. You can bet that mothers of all political persuasions will get an earful of this.

These revelations of the activities of Mr. Foley has prompted an all out “Circular Panic Shootout” amongst Republicans, with each and every one facing the electorate this November distancing himself/herself from Foley.

This “October Surprise” could be the final nail in the coffin for the Republican Party. The “chickens have come home to roost,” and the “Values” and “Faith” Party is in deep trouble.

“I will not withdraw even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me,”—George Bush, speaking to a group of Republicans in the White House, according to Bob Woodward (Award Winning Journalist) in his new book: State of Denial. Barney is one of the Bush’s two dogs.

In May 2003, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld while speaking to a cheering congregation of U.S. troops in Qatar said, “So when people are writing the history books, you’re going to be in it. Thank you very much.”

The Vice President Mr. Dick Cheney in an appearance on September 14, 2003 in a “Meet the Press” weekly show with NBC’s Tim Russert said, “My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.”

House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) recently, sounding much like CNN’s Lou Dobbs, linked immigrants to terrorist and criminal gangs by saying: “Illegal’s crossing our borders are gang members who cross to injure our citizens. This is a daily struggle in some towns.”

These four statements and many others I have not listed here sum up the dysfunctional, hypocritical and deceitful “Republican Mentality” that readily permeates the party from top to bottom.

If you read in between the lines, the intimation is that Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney have been fighting this war for the sake of “history,” ….and that “illegal immigrants” and by extension “legal immigrants” are just a bunch of criminals and terrorists—dangerous and deceitful rhetoric expressly intended drive an “immigration wedge” to divide America, and instill fear all the way to the November ballot box.

Like seasoned predators Republicans have in the last couple of years skillfully capitalized on a basic human instinct of “fear of the unknown” to weave a national security policy of “fear” into the psyche of the American public, with incredible effectiveness.

A few weeks to the mid-term elections, the “Kings” of “Wedge Issues” and partisan smears are at it again, even though they are clearly on the ropes this time around.

While Bush has been choreographing the “Terrorist Fear Branch,” the right wing of the Republican party led by xenophobes like Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, George Allen and James Sensenbrenner among many others have been “stroking” the locals by holding anti-immigrant town-hall style hate meetings to “rally the base” of the Republican party, a base comprising of maniacal extremists still hanging on to America’s bloody and racially intolerant past.

The so called “House Republican Immigration Field Hearings” conducted in the recent months supposedly explored the “societal and governmental costs of illegal immigrants,” use of health-care facilities, welfare and “the criminal consequences of illegal immigration.” These meetings turned out to be “Distortion Dens” in which immigrants were mercilessly vilified. Manufactured videos of immigrants crossing in from Mexico superimposed with images of Osama bin Laden and Zacharias Moussaoui were played to “fearful” Town-Hall congregants, and are still appearing on TV screens in numerous family living rooms across America.

Needless to say that the “positive” contributions of immigrants (illegal & legal) have been totally blanked out in favor of blood-letting, high-stakes demonizing, irrational and rampant xenophobia aimed at “the disease carrying homeland invaders.” Also, totally swept aside is the Senate bill that would have been a workable starting point from which to work on this complex issue, in order to reach a rational and comprehensive solution.

In order to placate their “base,” the Republican dominated U.S. government has been conducting sweeping immigration raids across the country, inhumanely separating children born in The United States, who are constitutionally American citizens, from their immigrant mothers and fathers …. well meaning “Economic Refugees,” from third world nations racked with incompetent and thieving governments…..some with the assistance of greedy U.S. multi-national corporations whose “colonial” and corrupt profit motive is legendary.

Even Tom Kean, former Republican Governor of New Jersey and a respected ex-911 commissioner has joined the fray for the sake of “Dear Party,” pulling a “Michael Moorer” on Democrats. Sources indicate that Mr. Kean was hired as a pre-production consultant for the movie “The path to 9-11″ a TV miniseries which grossly misrepresents the facts in the 9/11 Commission report and portrays the Clinton administration in bad light.

Clearly, a desperate attempt by Republican operatives in collaboration with a “ratings hungry” media powerhouse (ABC/Disney) to influence the electorate.

If this movie were not a sneaky political move why was an advance copy of the film given to right wing extremist radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh – a self-serving demagogue who has a penchant for monstrous distortions and extremist hyperbole.

Other reports from Washington indicate that the Republicans are planning to unload their significantly superior financial war chest on Democrats in the form of negative TV and Radio ads over personal issues and local controversies. According to these reports, the Republican Congressional committee has dispatched operatives to comb through personal records to find damaging information on their Democratic opponents.

Even though mud-flinging is a political staple for both parties and in-fact almost everywhere else in the world, the Republicans are masters at this game and can ratchet it up to ludicrous levels.

Look out for Republican candidates to become meaner and more twisted in the coming few weeks.

But will the moderate “swing” voters in both parties buy into this charade this time around?

According to a CNN Poll conducted on September 6, 57% of Americans without a high school education believe that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 911 attacks (a fact most recently denied in a news conference August 21, when President Bush said Hussein had “nothing” to do with the attacks), 54% of High School graduates believe likewise. Only 39% of college graduates believe the same. The number dwindles dramatically to 19% for postgraduates.

Are Americans that ill informed? If so then we should expect another Republican win this November.

Will red baiting terror, using politics of deceit, fear and hate work this time?

Will the Republican party successfully energize their “intolerant” right wing base and also scare the pants off moderate Republicans, Independents and even some Democrats….again?

Is the Republican Party running on fumes?

Cheap political scores that violate the core of internationally revered American values like hurriedly establishing military commissions that will utilize “alternative forms of torture” in order to claim the mantle as the “toughest in the war on terror” are very troubling, notwithstanding the fact that these measures have been implemented in other countries before with little or no success.

Piecemeal measures that are politically targeted and principally bankrupt, without any long-term solutions is not the way to govern this great nation.

Coercion, “bribery,” and scare tactics have destroyed the good standing of America in the eyes of the rest of the world during this administration’s tenure.

On moral, political and pragmatic grounds the Democratic Party or even better non-aligned independents should wake up and right the American ship, for the Republicans have failed miserably….they have bamboozled the citizenry, betrayed their trust and misappropriated their hard earned tax money in an unnecessary “imperialist” war.

Another Republican majority in both houses will be a disaster. America’s standing as measuring rod for the rest of the world has been severely compromised and stands to diminish even further if Republicans are given a blank check to continue with their “pillaging sham.”

The American people need to wake up too and send a strong message to both Parties, that partisan politicking without principle is damaging to all and sundry, party faithful or no party.

Perhaps we need a “rational” third party?

02/01/08 Harley Cyrus Part 1

Marina and Harley spar outside of Company. Cyrus steals a necklace from an old paramour. Harley tells Frank about Marina’s plan. Marina and Cyrus question if it’s over.

Marina and Harley meet outside of Company. Marina is looking for Cyrus. Harley doesn’t know where he is. Marina and Harley get into a fight with Marina telling Harley to stay out of her business and away from Cyrus.

Cyrus meets an old friend named Kitty. Kitty flirts with Cyrus showing him her new set of pearls. Cyrus sneaks into the room and steals the pearls.

Harley cleaning Company when Frank remarks that something is wrong after all a Cooper cleans when they are frustrated. Frank remarks that there was something hinky with immigration. He thinks that Cyrus was playing Marina. Harley sets Frank right saying that Marina set up everything with the fake immigration records.

Marina sees Cyrus with the pearls. Marina remarks that he steals. Cyrus counters that she lies to him. He knows she lied about immigration because she doesn’t trust him. He questions if Harley is right? Marina lies badly and Cyrus blames himself. Cyrus says both of them are better off if he just leaves. He’s a thief it’s what he knows. Marina says that he has changed. Cyrus remarks that he doesn’t do domestic. Marina realizes that he considers being in suburbia more of a prison. Cyrus is not the guy that either of them want him to be. Cyrus says she shouldn’t have to lie to get a man to marry her. He should want to because he loves her. Cyrus says that the way they are going right now. It’s better if they are over.

Duration : 0:7:10

Continue Reading…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How long would the PC 488 stay on my records will it affect my job employment or immigration status?

I was convicted of petty theft. The cost of the merchandise was $32.00. What is going to happen and how is this misdemeanor going to affect my record? I have never done anything so stupid, I'm an adult. I am an immigrant, will i be able to get this off my record by enrolling in any program in California?

With the system we have, you could be a felon and be able to enter the country.

powered by Yahoo answers

How do I find immigration records from 1900's coming from Eastern Europe?

I have been trying to find records from where my family came from Belarus/Poland/Lithuania/Ukraine/Russia. I believe that they came into Phila. I do not have the year that they came to America. I have been on the Ellis Island and Philadelphia Immigration websites and have found nothing.

I know that research is called that for a reason, but where else can I look? Was there a common port they left from in that area of Europe? Are there better sites to check? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I would have no problems talking to someone via email I am just leary of throwing it out there. I appreciate the info though.

Our problem in my family is that we have no idea where we actually come from. All searches I have been able to find have brought me death indexes and the cemetary where my great-grandparents were buried. I have found others with my last name, but I have no idea if they are related to me or not. I am not the first to do this research and the other person was never able to locate a marriage certificate or deed. I think I might be able to get those by going to the county they lived in. But I am lost on when they came over or where they came from.
I am sorry I did not clarify. I am not looking for some far gone ancestor. We share the same last name and there are not that many of us in the world. I appreciate the advice though and I am sure I will be around asking more questions. :)
If you provide additional information to this question that identifies a specific individual(s) name, maybe a birthdate (even an approximate guess), a spouses name or child that may have immigrated with them, there are a number of rather experienced people who keep an eye on this forum who have access to quite a few resources (often fee based) that might not be readily available to you.

We might be able to come up with something.

powered by Yahoo answers

Does immigration in the united states check all oversea's visitors for criminal records when they arrive?

I am planning to travel to Hawaii for 2 weeks as part of my honeymoon. My partner has a previous criminal conviction and just wanted to know whether immigration will find out if it is not declared?

Normally, the airlines enter all dates before departure and are transfering them to the us authorities. When you arrive in the US, the entry will be refused and you have to fly back nearly immediately, in the worst case on your own expenses.
Some years ago, I had a client who was previously convicted ( drugs ) and he flew to Chicago and the authorities sent him back on the next plane.
So , I think, it could be wiser to apply for a visa.

Have a nice day

K.

powered by Yahoo answers

Immigration records prove America the greatest, why not admit it?


Don't know what records you mean but America's records are for LEGAL immigrants.
If you ask a lot of folks around the world, many would not agree that the USA is anything but skewed up. Frankly, at this point I would have to agree with them.
Do you really think we are the greatest? I'm wondering these days.

powered by Yahoo answers

Why can't I find immigration records?

I have been searching for my ancestors names on passenger lists and for their naturaliztion paperwork. I have tried every possible spelling and nothing comes up. My Great Grandfather had a SS card and served in WWI so he would have to have been a citizen, but why can't I find any info on him.

This may be useful:

B. 1894 in Mannheim, Germany
Arrived 1899
Listed himself as a naturalized citizen on several census forms
Lived in Minnesota until around 1910, and moved to Idaho and stayed there until he died in 1981

Here are some reasons you might not have found him:

He entered through a port you haven't yet searched.
He immigrated to Canada and then crossed the border into Minnesota.
His name was different at the time he immigrated than the name he used lated in life.
His name is misspelled on the record.
His name is misindexed in the index.
His family immigrated under a pseudonym to avoid financial, legal, or military problems.
The manifest on which he was listed was lost or destroyed.

There are lots more reasons.

Right now, through the end of November, Ancestry.com is offering free access to their immigration collection which contains indexed digital images of all easily obtainable US passenger manifests (not just Ellis Island). So, if you haven't already checked out this resource, do so now!

Another option is to look for naturalization papers. the naturalization record should tell you the name of the ship and the date of immigration. Since he was born in 1894 and moved to Idaho in 1910, he would have been naturalized in Idaho. Check the microfilms for Idaho naturalization records at the Family History Library (you can borrow these through a Family History Center near you). The Family History Library has the following naturalization records:

Naturalization records, Central District, Moscow, Idaho, 1892-1935 United States. District Court (Idaho)

Naturalization records, Eastern District, Pocatello, Idaho, 1893-1945 United States. District Court (Idaho)

Naturalization records, Northern District, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 1909-1929 United States. District Court (Idaho)

Naturalization records, Southern District, Boise, Idaho, 1891-1934 United States. District Court (Idaho)

One last point: a person did not have to be a citizen to have a social security card or serve in the military.

powered by Yahoo answers